The argument has in it something plausible; but a close examination shows it to be quite unsound.Even if the alleged facts are admitted, still the Jews are not the only people who have preferred their sect to their country.The feeling of patriotism, when society is in a healthful state springs up, by a natural and inevitable association, in the minds of citizens who know that they owe all their comforts and pleasures to the bond which unites them in one community.But, under a partial and oppressive Government, these associations cannot acquire that strength which they have in a better state of things.Men are compelled to seek from their party that protection which they ought to receive from their country, and they, by a natural consequence, transfer to their party that affection which they would otherwise have felt for their country.The Huguenots of France called in the help of England against their Catholic kings.The Catholics of France called in the help of Spain against a Huguenot king.Would it be fair to infer, that at present the French Protestants would wish to see their religion made dominant by the help of a Prussian or an English army?
Surely not, and why is it that they are not willing, as they formerly were willing, to sacrifice the interests of their country to the interests of their religious persuasion? The reason is obvious: they were persecuted then, and are not persecuted now.The English Puritans, under Charles the First, prevailed on the Scotch to invade England.Do the Protestant Dissenters of our time wish to see the Church put down by an invasion of foreign Calvinists? If not, to what cause are we to attribute the change? Surely to this, that the Protestant Dissenters are far better treated now than in the seventeenth century.Some of the most illustrious public men that England ever produced were inclined to take refuge from the tyranny of Laud in North America.Was this because Presbyterians and Independents are incapable of loving their country? But it is idle to multiply instances.Nothing is so offensive to a man who knows anything of history or of human nature as to hear those who exercise the powers of government accuse any sect of foreign attachments.If there be any proposition universally true in politics it is this, that foreign attachments are the fruit of domestic misrule.It has always been the trick of bigots to make their subjects miserable at home, and then to complain that they look for relief abroad; to divide society, and to wonder that it is not united; to govern as if a section of the State were the whole, and to censure the other sections of the State for their want of patriotic spirit.If the Jews have not felt towards England like children, it is because she has treated them like a step-mother.There is no feeling which more certainly develops itself in the minds of men living under tolerably good government than the feeling of patriotism.Since the beginning of the world, there never was any nation, or any large portion of any nation, not cruelly oppressed, which was wholly destitute of that feeling.To make it therefore ground of accusation against a class of men, that they are not patriotic, is the most vulgar legerdemain of sophistry.It is the logic which the wolf employs against the lamb.It is to accuse the mouth of the stream of poisoning the source.
If the English Jews really felt a deadly hatred to England, if the weekly prayer of their synagogues were that all the curses denounced by Ezekiel on Tyre and Egypt might fall on London, if, in their solemn feasts, they called down blessings on those who should dash their children to pieces on the stones, still, we say, their hatred to their countrymen would not be more intense than that which sects of Christians have often borne to each other.But in fact the feeling of the Jews is not such.It is precisely what, in the situation in which they are placed, we should expect it to be.They are treated far better than the French Protestants were treated in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, or than our Puritans were treated in the time of Laud.
They, therefore, have no rancour against the Government or against their countrymen.It will not be denied that they are far better affected to the State than the followers of Coligni or Vane.But they are not so well treated as the dissecting sects of Christians are now treated in England; and on this account, and, we firmly believe, on this account alone, they have a more exclusive spirit.Till we have carried the experiment further, we are not entitled to conclude that they cannot be made Englishmen altogether.The statesman who treats them as aliens, and then abuses them for not entertaining all the feelings of natives, is as unreasonable as the tyrant who punished their fathers for not making bricks without straw.
