登陆注册
15709400000259

第259章

The principle is, that either at the beginning, or ultimately, such questions shall or may be decided by the national tribunals. If in any suit properly cognizable in a State court the decision should turn on a clause in the Constitution, or on a law of the United States, or on the act of a national offense, or on the validity of a national act, an appeal lies to the Supreme Court of the United States and to its officers. The object has been to give to the national tribunals of the nation full cognizance of its own laws, treaties, and congressional acts.

The judges of all the national tribunals, of whatever grade or rank, hold their offices for life, and are removable only on impeachment.

They are not even removable on an address of Congress; thus holding on a firmer tenure even than our own judges, who may, I believe, be moved on an address by Parliament. The judges in America are not entitled to any pension or retiring allowances; and as there is not, as regards the judges of the national courts, any proviso that they shall cease to sit after a certain age, they are in fact immovable whatever may be their infirmities. Their position in this respect is not good, seeing that their salaries will hardly admit of their making adequate provision for the evening of life. The salary of the Chief Justice of the United States is only 1300l. per annum.

All judges of the national courts, of whatever rank, are appointed by the President, but their appointments must be confirmed by the Senate. This proviso, however, gives to the Senate practically but little power, and is rarely used in opposition to the will of the President. If the President name one candidate, who on political grounds is distasteful to a majority of the Senate, it is not probable that a second nomination made by him will be more satisfactory. This seems now to be understood, and the nomination of the cabinet ministers and of the judges, as made by the President, are seldom set aside or interfered with by the Senate, unless on grounds of purely personal objection.

The position of the national judges as to their appointments and mode of tenure is very different from that of the State judges, to whom in a few lines I shall more specially allude. This should, Ithink, be specially noticed by Englishmen when criticising the doings of the American courts. I have observed statements made to the effect that decisions given by American judges as to international or maritime affairs affecting English interests could not be trusted, because the judges so giving them would have been elected by popular vote, and would be dependent on the popular voice for reappointment. This is not so. Judges are appointed by popular vote in very many of the States. But all matters affecting shipping and all questions touching foreigners are tried in the national courts before judges who have been appointed for life. I should not myself have had any fear with reference to the ultimate decision in the affair of Slidell and Mason had the "Trent" been carried into New York. I would, however, by no means say so much had the cause been one for trial before the tribunals of the State of New York.

I have been told that we in England have occasionally fallen into the error of attributing to the Supreme Court at Washington a quasi political power which it does not possess. This court can give no opinion to any department of the government, nor can it decide upon or influence any subject that has not come before it as a regularly litigated case in law. Though especially founded by the Constitution, it has no peculiar power under the Constitution, and stands in no peculiar relation either to that or to acts of Congress. It has no other power to decide on the constitutional legality of an act of Congress or an act of a State legislature, or of a public officer, than every court, State and National, high and low, possesses and is bound to exercise. It is simply the national court of last appeal.

In the different States such tribunals have been established as each State by its constitution and legislation has seen fit to adopt.

同类推荐
  • 彭公案

    彭公案

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 麻平晚行

    麻平晚行

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 默庵诗集

    默庵诗集

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 脏腑虚实标本用药式

    脏腑虚实标本用药式

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 凤山县志

    凤山县志

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
热门推荐
  • 王俊凯之时光之亡

    王俊凯之时光之亡

    王俊凯!我喜欢你,什么时候开始的呢,我早已忘记,我只知道我会为一个人心痛,烦恼,情绪被牵扯,怎么办,这好像不是我了。三年?没关系!我等你,可是这三年里我不知道发生了什么事,三年后你回来了……可是我们已经不是从前的我们了……
  • 不霁何虹:独爱冷王爷

    不霁何虹:独爱冷王爷

    离奇失忆,选秀失败,贵为名门小姐的她发誓报复。高冷隐忍,傲娇避世,出身帝家王爷的他兵来将挡。阴差阳错,两个人拜了堂,各怀心事地步步为营。斗后母,振家业;除佞臣,保帝王,夫妻联合,其利断金。同床异梦的两个人最终情难自禁,高能小姐舍旧爱,拒皇上,独爱冷王爷。
  • 尘世尘

    尘世尘

    无常之世,尘世之尘。Weallsuffer,nobodycansurvive.
  • 能改斋漫录

    能改斋漫录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 琴音

    琴音

    她,绝望地阻止一个生命的离开,同时却在诅咒一个生命的到来;她,为逝去的爱情黯然神伤,也为突然而至的友情欢喜雀跃。温暖的友情成了她溺毙前最后的救命稻草,却不该是她得以生存下去的唯一依靠。这个世界还有真正的朋友吗?充斥着谎言的人生,欺凌不断上演,只为完成她内心的诅咒.而,欺凌的人是不被原谅的。
  • 首席与超模:你并不拥有我

    首席与超模:你并不拥有我

    吧台,饮料,跑车,雪茄,屋顶,情迷,泳池,暧昧,周末,小岛,驻足,哽咽,远望,迷茫,华服,闪耀,醒来,残缺,脆弱,翻脸。一个是喜欢自己掌控去向、向往自由的模特,一个是喜欢控制自己爱人的去向、不懂软来的设计师。两个自尊心很强的人在一起,一个爱得太随性,一个爱得太窒息,因此这份从你侬我侬到死去活来的爱很甜很涩很有嚼头。
  • 晨晓天晴

    晨晓天晴

    她,身世平凡,但是她从小学习刻苦。一次机会,她到一所小学工作,经历了许多喜怒哀乐。一次,她又遇到了她命中注定的人。
  • 终不遇

    终不遇

    如果十年都不算久,那多久算久呢?顾左薏爱叶北辰,一晃十年,可是最后她才发现。她就像叶北辰手指上永远多出的那段指甲,不管她多么努力,最后总会被无情地修剪掉。她隐忍着不喊痛,但还是遍体鳞伤。后来顾左薏学会不爱了。不爱的那一瞬只需要一瞬。多么不公平。
  • 无虐不欢:老板贴身男宠

    无虐不欢:老板贴身男宠

    在繁华喧嚣的城市中,一处生意火爆的咖啡店,店里面摆放着各种稀奇古怪的玩意,最出名莫过于那一排古老的名剑,有人出千万欲购之,一一被咖啡店里的铸剑师拒绝。他说这些利刃只买给有缘人,这里每一把利刃都有自己的故事。但是在这个夜晚,随着一位女子的出现,一切都变了!——终于等到你啊,还好没放弃!
  • 卫将军文子

    卫将军文子

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。