[9] Die Voraussetzungen des Sozialismus und die Aufgaben der Sozial-Demokratie.''
In March, 1914, Bernstein delivered a lecture in Budapest in which he withdrew from several of the positions he had taken up (vide Budapest``Volkstimme,'' March 19, 1914).
Berstein represents the decay of Marxian orthodoxy from within.Syndicalism represents an attack against it from without, from thestandpoint of a doctrine which professes to be even more radical and more revolutionary than that of Marx and Engels.The attitude of Syndicalists to Marx may be seen in Sorel's little book, ``La Decomposition du Marxisme,'' and in his larger work, ``Reflections on Violence,'' authorized translation by T.E.Hulme (Allen & Unwin, 1915).After quoting Bernstein, with approval in so far as he criticises Marx, Sorel proceeds to other criticisms of a different order.He points out (what is true) that Marx's theoretical economics remain very near to Manchesterism: the orthodox political economy of his youth was accepted by him on many points on which it is now known to be wrong.According to Sorel, the really essential thing in Marx's teaching is the class war.Whoever keeps this alive is keeping alive the spirit of Socialism much more truly than those who adhere to the letter of Social-Democratic orthodoxy.On the basis of the class war, French Syndicalists developed a criticism of Marx which goes much deeper than those that we have been hitherto considering.Marx's views on historical development may have been in a greater or less degree mistaken in fact, and yet the economic and political system which he sought to create might be just as desirable as his followers suppose.Syndicalism, however, criticises, not only Marx's views of fact, but also the goal at which he aims and the general nature of the means which he recommends.Marx's ideas were formed at a time when democracy did not yet exist.It was in the very year in which ``Das Kapital'' appeared that urban working men first got the vote in England and universal suffrage was granted by Bismarck in Northern Germany.It was natural that great hopes should be entertained as to what democracy would achieve.Marx, like the orthodox economists, imagined that men's opinions are guided by a more or less enlightened view of economic self-interest, or rather of economic class interest.A long experience of the workings of political democracy has shown that in this respect Disraeli and Bismarck were shrewder judges of human nature than either Liberals or Socialists.It has become increasingly difficult to put trust in the State as a means to liberty, or in political parties as instruments sufficiently powerful to force the State into the service of the people.The modern State, says Sorel, ``is a body of intellectuals, which is invested with privileges, and which possessesmeans of the kind called political for defending itself against the attacks made on it by other groups of intellectuals, eager to possess the profits of public employment.Parties are constituted in order to acquire the conquest of these employments, and they are analogous to the State.''[10]
[10] La Decomposition du Marxisme,'' p.53.
Syndicalists aim at organizing men, not by party, but by occupation.This, they say, alone represents the true conception and method of the class war.Accordingly they despise all POLITICAL action through the medium of Parliament and elections: the kind of action that they recommend is direct action by the revolutionary syndicate or trade union.The battle- cry of industrial versus political action has spread far beyond the ranks of French Syndicalism.It is to be found in the I.W.W.in America, and among Industrial Unionists and Guild Socialists in Great Britain.Those who advocate it, for the most part, aim also at a different goal from that of Marx.They believe that there can be no adequate individual freedom where the State is all-powerful, even if the State be a Socialist one.Some of them are out-and- out Anarchists, who wish to see the State wholly abolished; others only wish to curtail its authority.Owing to this movement, opposition to Marx, which from the Anarchist side existed from the first, has grown very strong.It is this opposition in its older form that will occupy us in our next chapter.
