登陆注册
15453500000191

第191章 VOLUME III(22)

As I have not used up so much of my time as I had supposed, I will dwell a little longer upon one or two of these minor topics upon which the Judge has spoken. He has read from my speech in Springfield, in which I say that "a house divided against itself cannot stand" Does the Judge say it can stand? I don't know whether he does or not. The Judge does not seem to be attending to me just now, but I would like to know if it is his opinion that a house divided against itself can stand. If he does, then there is a question of veracity, not between him and me, but between the Judge and an Authority of a somewhat higher character.

Now, my friends, I ask your attention to this matter for the purpose of saying something seriously. I know that the Judge may readily enough agree with me that the maxim which was put forth by the Savior is true, but he may allege that I misapply it; and the Judge has a right to urge that, in my application, I do misapply it, and then I have a right to show that I do not misapply it, When he undertakes to say that because I think this nation, so far as the question of slavery is concerned, will all become one thing or all the other, I am in favor of bringing about a dead uniformity in the various States, in all their institutions, he argues erroneously. The great variety of the local institutions in the States, springing from differences in the soil, differences in the face of the country, and in the climate, are bonds of Union. They do not make "a house divided against itself," but they make a house united. If they produce in one section of the country what is called for, by the wants of another section, and this other section can supply the wants of the first, they are not matters of discord, but bonds of union, true bonds of union. But can this question of slavery be considered as among these varieties in the institutions of the country? I leave it to you to say whether, in the history of our government, this institution of slavery has not always failed to be a bond of union, and, on the contrary, been an apple of discord and an element of division in the house. I ask you to consider whether, so long as the moral constitution of men's minds shall continue to be the same, after this generation and assemblage shall sink into the grave, and another race shall arise, with the same moral and intellectual development we have, whether, if that institution is standing in the same irritating position in which it now is, it will not continue an element of division? If so, then I have a right to say that, in regard to this question, the Union is a house divided against itself; and when the Judge reminds me that I have often said to him that the institution of slavery has existed for eighty years in some States, and yet it does not exist in some others, I agree to the fact, and I account for it by looking at the position in which our fathers originally placed it--restricting it from the new Territories where it had not gone, and legislating to cut off its source by the abrogation of the slave trade, thus putting the seal of legislation against its spread. The public mind did rest in the belief that it was in the course of ultimate extinction.

But lately, I think--and in this I charge nothing on the Judge's motives--lately, I think that he, and those acting with him, have placed that institution on a new basis, which looks to the perpetuity and nationalization of slavery. And while it is placed upon this new basis, I say, and I have said, that I believe we shall not have peace upon the question until the opponents of slavery arrest the further spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinction; or, on the other hand, that its advocates will push it forward until it shall become alike lawful in all the States, old as well as new, North as well as South. Now, I believe if we could arrest the spread, and place it where Washington and Jefferson and Madison placed it, it would be in the course of ultimate extinction, and the public mind would, as for eighty years past, believe that it was in the course of ultimate extinction. The crisis would be past, and the institution might be let alone for a hundred years, if it should live so long, in the States where it exists; yet it would be going out of existence in the way best for both the black and the white races.

[A voice: "Then do you repudiate popular sovereignty?"]

Well, then, let us talk about popular sovereignty! what is popular sovereignty? Is it the right of the people to have slavery or not have it, as they see fit, in the Territories? I will state--and I have an able man to watch me--my understanding is that popular sovereignty, as now applied to the question of slavery, does allow the people of a Territory to have slavery if they want to, but does not allow them not to have it if they do not want it. I do not mean that if this vast concourse of people were in a Territory of the United States, any one of them would be obliged to have a slave if he did not want one; but I do say that, as I understand the Dred Scott decision, if any one man wants slaves, all the rest have no way of keeping that one man from holding them.

When I made my speech at Springfield, of which the Judge complains, and from which he quotes, I really was not thinking of the things which he ascribes to me at all. I had no thought in the world that I was doing anything to bring about a war between the free and slave states. I had no thought in the world that I was doing anything to bring about a political and social equality of the black and white races. It never occurred to me that I was doing anything or favoring anything to reduce to a dead uniformity all the local institutions of the various States. But I must say, in all fairness to him, if he thinks I am doing something which leads to these bad results, it is none the better that I did not mean it. It is just as fatal to the country, if I have any influence in producing it, whether I intend it or not.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 鲜妻撩人:顾少咱们不约

    鲜妻撩人:顾少咱们不约

    结婚纪念日,又一次收到顾先生送来的金卡后,顾太太忍不住失落道:“顾景琛,你就不能浪漫一点吗?”顾先生欣然答应:“好啊,老婆。下次在床上,你浪一点,我慢一点。”顾太太又羞又怒,红着脸斥道:“顾景琛,你就不能纯洁一点吗?!”顾先生挑眉一笑,伸手抱住了顾太太:“老婆,我很纯洁啊!不信,你帮我检查检查?从上到下,我保证自己全都纯纯的奉献给你哦……”“!!!”顾太太被以吻封缄,想反驳也说不出口了……
  • The Perfect Wagnerite

    The Perfect Wagnerite

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 舞世王妃

    舞世王妃

    女主去摘果子,不小心掉进一个山洞里……经过多次相遇,擦出了爱情的火花
  • 倾染天下:废柴七小姐

    倾染天下:废柴七小姐

    她,上一世,杀手之王。穿越?废柴?统统一边去,姐姐我天赋异禀,上有神兽灵丹,下有美男。咦?美男呢?某尊一脸邪笑:“染染···”“你,你做什毛?”“当然是做倾儿的美男啊。”“那个.....不用了。”“不用?晚了!”他,一方尊主,冷血无情,人称“冷血魔王”,令人诧异的是,他将某个小妖孽宠上了天!
  • TFBOYS之雨后的星空

    TFBOYS之雨后的星空

    这本书不是几句话能说清的老规矩大家还是来看看吧,意见或建议来加我QQ或讨论群来跟我说我随时恭候哦。
  • 分飞,缘尽

    分飞,缘尽

    临风守望三千年我是沉默的苍天看你流连穿梭在无路的世间你可以忘了你的初心我不能不信守我的爱情我驭风而来给你一声应允广大如我肯将全部的年华化作无边的等待作磐作石似誓似盟。
  • 愤而崛起

    愤而崛起

    一个只想通过时空走私赚点小钱过过逍遥日子的男人偏偏被卷入了另一个时代的变革。本故事纯属虚构,如有雷同,全是巧合。由于本人的工作性质属于长期户外,很难做到及时更新,有不到之处敬请各位大侠谅解。
  • 仙神天宇

    仙神天宇

    凡人道仙人无情,修士道长生不死。为了她转世重修是爱还是背后注定,冥冥中有一只背后黑手推动这一切。再登仙界踏破天宇看尽神途!我将封神!
  • EXO巧克力之恋

    EXO巧克力之恋

    中国的四个女生来到韩国上学,竟然遇到了史上最坑的花美男!
  • 浪游者的歌

    浪游者的歌

    我的小说、诗歌、散文集。给以往写的一些旧作和未来的新作找个家。